Sutra 2 2 32
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sutra 2_2_32
Original Text:
तदभावे नास्त्यनन्यता, तयोरितरेतरापेक्षसिद्धेः
Word-by-Word Breakdown
| Sanskrit Term | Transliteration | Hindi Meaning | English Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| तदभावे | tad-abhāve | उसके अभाव में – जब वह नहीं है | in the absence of that |
| नास्ति | nāsti | नहीं है – अस्तित्व नहीं है | does not exist |
| अनन्यता | ananyatā | अभिन्नता – भिन्नता का अभाव | non-difference; absence of distinction |
| तयोः | tayoḥ | उन दोनों का – दोनों के | of those two |
| इतरेतरापेक्षसिद्धेः | itaretara-apekṣā-siddheḥ | परस्पर-आश्रय सिद्धि के कारण – एक-दूसरे पर निर्भरता से स्थापित होने के कारण | because of being established through mutual dependence |
Concept List
- तदभाव (absence of that)
- अनन्यता (non-difference)
- इतरेतरापेक्षसिद्धि (mutual dependence)
- तयोः (of those two)
Subject–Verb–Object Triples
- absence of that – results in – non-difference not existing
- non-difference – is established through – mutual dependence
- mutual dependence – pertains to – those two
Triple Tables
Hindi
| विषय (S) | संबंध (V) | वस्तु (O) |
|---|---|---|
| तदभाव | के परिणामस्वरूप | अनन्यता का अभाव |
| अनन्यता | स्थापित होती है द्वारा | इतरेतरापेक्षसिद्धि |
| इतरेतरापेक्षसिद्धि | संबंधित है | तयोः |
English
| Subject (S) | Relation (V) | Object (O) |
|---|---|---|
| absence of that | results in | non-difference not existing |
| non-difference | is established through | mutual dependence |
| mutual dependence | pertains to | those two |
Translation/Explanation
Hindi
इस सूत्र में कहा गया है कि यदि वह (कारण) नहीं है, तो अनन्यता (कार्य-कारण की अभिन्नता) भी नहीं रहती, क्योंकि उन दोनों (कार्य और कारण) की अनन्यता परस्पर आश्रय (एक-दूसरे पर निर्भरता) के कारण ही सिद्ध होती है। अर्थात्, जब कारण का अभाव है, तो कार्य-कारण की अभिन्नता की बात भी नहीं रह जाती, क्योंकि वह दोनों के अस्तित्व पर निर्भर है।
English
This sūtra states that in the absence of that (the cause), non-difference (the identity of effect and cause) does not exist, because the non-difference of the two (effect and cause) is established only through their mutual dependence. In other words, when the cause is absent, the notion of non-difference between effect and cause also does not arise, since it depends on the existence of both.