Sbg 2.26 etassa

From IKS BHU
Revision as of 17:26, 3 December 2025 by imported>Vij (Added {content_identifier} content)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

English Translation of Abhinavgupta's Sanskrit Commentary By Dr. S. Sankaranarayan 2.26 Atha va etc. On the other hand if you deam 'This' to be the body and to be born constantly,-because its stream does not stop-even then, there is no necessity to lament. Or, if, following the [Vainasika Buddhists' ?] doctrine of continuous decay of things, you deem This to be constantly dying, even then where is the need for lamenting ? If you, in the same manner, deem the Self to be constantly born or to be constantly dying on account of Its contacts and separations with bodies, even then it is unwarranted, on every account, on the part of the men of rational thinking, to lament.

Otherwise this [division of]  permanence and impermanence does not stand reasoning.  For-