imported>Vij: Added/updated by bot page Sutra_3_2_27

2025-04-17T19:27:42Z

Added/updated by bot page Sutra_3_2_27

New page

== Sutra 3_2_27 ==
'''Original Text:'''
<pre>
साध्यत्वादहेतुः
</pre>

== Word-by-Word Breakdown ==

{| class="wikitable"
! Sanskrit Term !! Transliteration !! Hindi Meaning !! English Meaning
|-
| साध्यत्वात् || sādhya-tvāt || साध्य का होना – जो अभी सिद्ध नहीं हुआ है || being of the nature of sādhya (the proposition to be proved)
|-
| अहेतुः || ahetuḥ || कारण न होना – जो प्रमाण या कारण न हो || not a hetu; absence of being a valid reason
|}

== Concept List ==

* साध्यत्व (sādhyatva) – the state of being sādhya (probandum)
* अहेतु (ahetu) – absence of being a valid reason

== Subject–Verb–Object Triples ==

* साध्यत्व (sādhyatva) – causes – अहेतु (ahetu)
* साध्यत्व (sādhyatva) – results in – अहेतु (ahetu)

== Triple Tables ==

=== Hindi ===

{| class="wikitable"
! विषय (S) !! संबंध (V) !! वस्तु (O)
|-
| साध्यत्व || कारण है || अहेतु
|-
| साध्यत्व || परिणामस्वरूप है || अहेतु
|}

=== English ===

{| class="wikitable"
! Subject (S) !! Relation (V) !! Object (O)
|-
| Sādhyatva || causes || Ahetu
|-
| Sādhyatva || results in || Ahetu
|}

== Translation/Explanation ==

=== Hindi ===
इस सूत्र में कहा गया है कि यदि कोई तर्क या लक्षण स्वयं साध्य (जिसे सिद्ध करना है) के स्वरूप का हो, तो वह प्रमाण या हेत्व नहीं हो सकता। अर्थात्, जो चीज़ सिद्ध की जानी है, वही अगर कारण के रूप में प्रस्तुत हो, तो वह कारण नहीं मानी जाएगी। यह न्यायशास्त्र में हेत्वाभास (कथित कारण) की एक विशेषता बताई गई है।

=== English ===
This sūtra states that if a reason (hetu) is of the same nature as the sādhya (the proposition to be proved), it cannot serve as a valid reason. In other words, when the very thing to be established is presented as the reason, it is not considered a proper reason. This is an important criterion in Nyāya for identifying fallacious reasons (hetvābhāsa).

Sutra 3 2 27 - Revision history

imported>Vij: Added/updated by bot page Sutra_3_2_27