imported>Gagan at 08:38, 27 May 2025

2025-05-27T08:38:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 27 May 2025
Line 59:		Line 59:
	=== English ===		=== English ===
	This sūtra states that in cases where the subject or object is not specifically indicated (unmarked cases), the ascertainment or establishment of that (fact or thing) does not serve as a reason (hetu). In other words, when something is not explicitly specified, its ascertainment does not qualify as a cause in logical reasoning.		This sūtra states that in cases where the subject or object is not specifically indicated (unmarked cases), the ascertainment or establishment of that (fact or thing) does not serve as a reason (hetu). In other words, when something is not explicitly specified, its ascertainment does not qualify as a cause in logical reasoning.
			----

			==== <big>Edited Concept List</big> ====

			*हेतुः (reason/cause)

imported>Vij: Added/updated by bot page Sutra_2_2_90

2025-04-17T18:48:45Z

Added/updated by bot page Sutra_2_2_90

New page

== Sutra 2_2_90 ==
'''Original Text:'''
<pre>
तत्सिद्धेरलक्षितेष्वहेतुः
</pre>

== Word-by-Word Breakdown ==

{| class="wikitable"
! Sanskrit Term !! Transliteration !! Hindi Meaning !! English Meaning
|-
| तत्सिद्धेः || tat-siddheḥ || उस सिद्धि के कारण – किसी विशेष वस्तु या तथ्य की प्राप्ति के कारण || because of that establishment – due to the ascertainment of that (fact/thing)
|-
| अलक्षितेषु || alakṣiteṣu || जो निर्दिष्ट नहीं हैं – जिनका स्पष्ट रूप से उल्लेख या संकेत नहीं किया गया है || in unmarked cases – where the subject is not specifically indicated
|-
| अहेतुः || ahetuḥ || हेतु नहीं है – कारण नहीं है || not a reason – does not constitute a cause
|}

== Concept List ==

* तत्सिद्धि (ascertainment of that)
* अलक्षित (unmarked cases)
* हेतुः (reason/cause)
* अहेतुत्व (absence of causal status)

== Subject–Verb–Object Triples ==

* ascertainment of that – does not constitute a reason – unmarked cases
* ascertainment of that – lacks causal status – unmarked cases

== Triple Tables ==

=== Hindi ===

{| class="wikitable"
! विषय (S) !! संबंध (V) !! वस्तु (O)
|-
| उस सिद्धि (तत्सिद्धि) || कारण नहीं है (हेतु नहीं है) || अनिर्दिष्ट (अलक्षित)
|-
| उस सिद्धि (तत्सिद्धि) || कारणत्व से रहित है (हेतुत्व का अभाव है) || अनिर्दिष्ट (अलक्षित)
|}

=== English ===

{| class="wikitable"
! Subject (S) !! Relation (V) !! Object (O)
|-
| ascertainment of that || does not constitute a reason || unmarked cases
|-
| ascertainment of that || lacks causal status || unmarked cases
|}

== Translation/Explanation ==

=== Hindi ===
इस सूत्र में कहा गया है कि जब किसी विषय या वस्तु का स्पष्ट रूप से उल्लेख नहीं किया गया हो (अलक्षित), तो उस विषय की सिद्धि (तत्सिद्धि) कारण (हेतु) नहीं मानी जाती। अर्थात्, जब कोई तथ्य या वस्तु निर्दिष्ट नहीं है, तो उसकी सिद्धि से तर्क में कारणत्व स्थापित नहीं होता।

=== English ===
This sūtra states that in cases where the subject or object is not specifically indicated (unmarked cases), the ascertainment or establishment of that (fact or thing) does not serve as a reason (hetu). In other words, when something is not explicitly specified, its ascertainment does not qualify as a cause in logical reasoning.

Sutra 2 2 90 - Revision history

imported>Gagan at 08:38, 27 May 2025

imported>Vij: Added/updated by bot page Sutra_2_2_90