https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Sbg_6.2_etassaSbg 6.2 etassa - Revision history2026-04-30T05:25:19ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.44.3https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?title=Sbg_6.2_etassa&diff=8902&oldid=previmported>Vij: Added {content_identifier} content2025-12-04T06:23:34Z<p>Added {content_identifier} content</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>English Translation of Abhinavgupta's Sanskrit Commentary By Dr. S. Sankaranarayan<br />
6.1-2 The subject matter that has been thus established in the series of the preceding chapters is summarised by a couple of verses.<br />
<br />
Anasritah etc. Yam etc. Bounden : Ordained [in the law books] according to one's caste etc. [Thus] man-lf-renunciation and man-of-Yoga are synonyms. That is why [the Lord] says, 'what [the learned] call renunciation' etc. Therefore, without Yoga no renunciation is possible. Similarly Yoga is not possible without renouncing the intention [for fruit]. Conseently, the Yoga and renunciation are ever interlinked. The idea, suggested by 'not he who remains [simply] without his fires etc.' is this : He remains neither without fires, nor without actions and yet he is man of renunciation, Hence this is strange. <br />
Of course, following the principle [involved in the statement] 'Playing dice is the kingship, without throne', and following logic it has been asserted already that renunciation is not possible for a person who remains simply without actions. Yet-</div>imported>Vij