https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Sbg_2.58_etassaSbg 2.58 etassa - Revision history2026-04-18T17:58:28ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.44.3https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?title=Sbg_2.58_etassa&diff=5262&oldid=previmported>Vij: Added {content_identifier} content2025-12-03T12:05:37Z<p>Added {content_identifier} content</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>English Translation of Abhinavgupta's Sanskrit Commentary By Dr. S. Sankaranarayan<br />
2.58 Yada samharate etc. the nomenclature is not an expression having a composite of both the forces of etymological and traditional meanings, like the word pankaja 'a lotus'. But it has only the etymological force like the word pacaka 'a cook'. Whenever he (the sage) withdraws just in his own self-just as a tortoise keeps its limbs in its bossom-from the sense-objects i.e., warding off from the sense-objects, then and then [only] he is man-of-stabilized-intellect.<br />
<br />
Or [the passage may mean :] Whenever he withdraws, within his own Self, [all], beginning from the sense-objects upto sense-organs i.e., when he approprites in his own Self all in the form of sense-objects and sense-organs. <br />
But, how is it that the nomenclature 'a man-of-stabilized-intellect' does not hold good in the case of an ascetic ? It is answered-</div>imported>Vij