<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Sbg_11.37_setgb</id>
	<title>Sbg 11.37 setgb - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Sbg_11.37_setgb"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?title=Sbg_11.37_setgb&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T15:10:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?title=Sbg_11.37_setgb&amp;diff=14948&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Vij: Added {content_identifier} content</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://iks.bhu.edu.in/index.php?title=Sbg_11.37_setgb&amp;diff=14948&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T08:09:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Added {content_identifier} content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;English Translation Of Sri Shankaracharya&amp;#039;s Sanskrit Commentary By Swami Gambirananda&lt;br /&gt;
11.37 Ca, and; since You are the Primal Creator, the Cause, api, even; brahmanah, of Brahma, of Hiranyagarbha; therefore, kasmat, why, for what reason; should they na nameran, not bow down; te, to You; mahatman, O exalted One; gariyase, who are greater (than all)! Hence, why should these not bow down adi-karte, to the first Creator? Therefore You are fit for, i.e. the fit object of, delight etc. and salutation as well.&lt;br /&gt;
Ananta, O infinite One; devesa, supreme God; jagannivasa, Abode of the Universe; tvam, You; are the aksaram, Immutable; tat param yat, that which is Transcendental, which is heard of in the Upanisads;-what is that?-sad-asat, being and nonbeing. Being is that which exists, and non-being is that with regard to which the idea of nonexistence arises. (You are) that Immutable of which these two-being and non-being-become the limiting adjuncts; which (Immutable), as a result, is metaphorically referred to as being and non-being. But in reality that Immutable is transcendental to being and non-being. &amp;#039;That Immutable which the knowers of the Vedas declare&amp;#039; (8.11; cf. Ka. 1.2.15)-that is You Yourself, nothing else. This is the idea.&lt;br /&gt;
He praises again:&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Vij</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>